INEQUITIES IN URBAN DEVELOPMENT GLOBAL NORTH VERSUS SOUTH

Muhammad Haneef, Shahbaz Altaf

Abstract


The increased urban influx over the globe is that much high that 55% of the world population currently lives in urban area while 68% of the world population is projected in urban centers by 2050, says UN (UN, 2018). The causes for the urban population increase are political, economic, natural population growth, education institutes, social picks, environmental and calamities etc. The urban centers if planned and developed accurately are considered economy generation engines for the whole country whereas in other case the urban sprawl contributes to longer commutes, high costs of services. In this urban age a group of researcher argued that the inequities in global urban development are capitalism. While the other group states that capitalism is just one aspect among many others causing uneven global urban development especially in Global South. In this article we have compared and contrast the ways in which urban development is understood in the Global North and Global South. How are these understandings similar, and divergent in each scenario? It is claimed that major factors for understanding urban development in Global North have been Agglomeration Economics and Marxism. Urban Development of Global South, on the other hand, has been largely understood through the notions of over-accumulation and globalization. Then, we have discussed similarities and differences of urban development understanding in both the regions. Lastly, we focused on the emerging idea of Governmentality and how it could be beneficial to understand urban development in Global South. In addition, critique the notion of urbanism in South from through a single lens of neoliberalis.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Castells, M. (1977). From the Study of Space to the Analysis of the City. The Urban Question, 234-242.

Childe, G. (1950). The Urban Revolution. Town Planning Review.

Pirenne, H. (1925). City Origins. In F. S. Richard LeGates (Ed.), The City Reader. New York: Routledge .

Harvey, D. (1997). Contested Cities: Social Process and Spatial Form. In F. S. Richard LeGates (Ed.), The City Reader. New York: Routledge.

Gordon, D. (1978). Capitalist Development and History of American Cities . In L. S. Wlliam Tabb (Ed.), Marxism and Metropolis: New Perspective in Urban and Politcal Economy (pp. 25-63). New York : Oxford University Press.

Christophers, B. (2011). Revisiting the Urbanization of Capital. Annal of the Association of American Geographers.

De Angelis, M. (2004). Separating the Doing and the Deed: Capital and the Continuous Character of Enclosures. Historical Materialism, 57-58.

Glaeser, E. L., & Gottlieb, J. D. (2009). The Wealth of Cities: Agglomeration Economies and Spatial Equilibrium in the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, 9831028.

Ball, T. Dagger, R. (2009). Political Ideologies and the Democratic Ideal. Pearson.

Miraftab, F. (2016). Global Heartland: Displaced Labor, Transnational Lives & Local Placemaking. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Lemanski, C. (2012). Everyday human (in) security: Rescaling for the Southern city. Security Dialogue, 43(1), 6178.

Satterthwaite, D., McGranahan, G., & Tacoli, C. (2010). Urbanization and its implications for food and farming. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 28092820.

UN-Habitat. (2015). Slum Almanac 2015/2016: Tracking Improvement in the Lives of Slum Dwellers. Nairobi, Kenya

Abu-Lughod, J. L. (1987). The Islamic City--Historic Myth, Islamic Essence, and Contemporary Relevance. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 155-176.

Elsheshtawy, Y. (2011). The New Arab City. In R. LeGates, & F. Stout (Eds.), The City Reader (pp. 328-337). New York: Routledge.

Karaman, O. (2013). Urban Neoliberalism with Islamic Characteristics. Urban Studies, 3412 - 3427.

Clarke, S. (1988) Keynesianism, Monetarism and the Crisis of the State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Li, T. M. (2007). Governmentality. Anthropologica, 49(2), 275281.

Scott, D. (1995). Colonial Governmentality. Social Text 43:191-220.

United Nations. (2018). The 2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects produced by the Population Division of the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). Retrieved from chrome- extension:// https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html

Alford, R. R., & Friedland, R. (1985). Powers of theory: Capitalism, the state, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.

Anjaria, J. S. (2016). The slow boil: Street food, rights and public space in Mumbai. Stanford University Press.

Brenner, N., & Keil, R. (2014). From global cities to globalized urbanization. Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation, 3(1), 117.

Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of actually existing neoliberalism. Antipode, 34(3), 349379.

Bryceson, D. F. (2000). Disappearing peasantries? Rural labour redundancy in the neo-liberal era and beyond. Disappearing Peasantries, 299326.

Caldeira, T. P. (2012). Fortified enclaves: The new urban segregation. In The Urban Sociology Reader (pp. 419427). Routledge.

Caldeira, T. P. (2017). Peripheral urbanization: Autoconstruction, transversal logics, and politics in cities of the global south. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(1), 320.

Castells, M. (1989). The informational city: Information technology, economic restructuring, and the urban-regional process. Blackwell Oxford.

Chatterjee, P. (2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. Columbia University Press.

Chen, M. A. (2016). The informal economy: Recent trends, future directions. New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 26(2), 155172.

Davis, D. E. (2005). Cities in global context: A brief intellectual history. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(1), 92109.

Davis, M. (2006). Planet of slums. New Perspectives Quarterly, 23(2), 611.

Ferguson, J. (2010). The uses of neoliberalism. Antipode, 41, 166184.

Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (Second). New York : NY: Vintage Books.

Foucault, M. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. University of Chicago Press.

Friedmann, J. (1986). The world city hypothesis. Development and Change, 17(1), 6983.

Ghertner, D. A. (2015). Why gentrification theory fails in much of the world. City, 19(4), 552563.

Hackworth, J. (2007). The neoliberal city: Governance, ideology, and development in American urbanism. Cornell University Press.

Hardoy, J. E., & Satterthwaite, D. (1991). Environmental problems of Third World cities: A global issue ignored? Public Administration and Development, 11(4), 341361.

Harvey, D. (1978). The urban process under capitalism: A framework for analysis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2(13), 101131.

Harvey, D. (2001). Globalization and the spatial fix.

Harvey, D. (2005). The new imperialism. OUP Oxford.

Holston, J. (2009). Insurgent citizenship in an era of global urban peripheries. City & Society, 21(2), 245267.

Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483499.

Leitner, H., Peck, J., & Sheppard, E. S. (2007). Contesting neoliberalism: Urban frontiers. Guilford Press.

Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407437.

Marcuse, P., & Kempen, R. van. (2000). Conclusion: A changed spatial order. Globalizing Cities: A New Spatial Order?, 249275.

Miraftab, F., & McConnell, E. D. (2008). Multiculturalizing rural townsInsights for inclusive planning. International Planning Studies, 13(4), 343360.

Parnell, S., & Robinson, J. (2012). (Re) theorizing cities from the Global South: Looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geography, 33(4), 593617.

Peck, J. (2008). Remaking laissez-faire. Progress in Human Geography, 32(1), 343.

Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2009). Neoliberal urbanism: Models, moments, mutations. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 29(1), 4966.

Robinson, J. (2002a). Global and world cities: A view from off the map. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(3), 531554.

Robinson, J. (2002b). Ordinary cities: Between modernity and development. Routledge.

Ross, R., & Trachte, K. (1983). Global cities and global classes: The peripheralization of labor in New York City. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 6(3), 393431.

Roy, A. (2005). Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147158.

Roy, A. (2009). Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory, 8(1), 7687.

Saad-Filho, A., & Johnston, D. (2005). Neoliberalism: A critical reader. University of Chicago Press.

Sassen, S. (2005). The global city: Introducing a concept. Brown J. World Aff., 11, 27.

Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (2015). The nature of cities: The scope and limits of urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(1), 115.

Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. Guilford press.

Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416424.

UN-Habitat. (2004). The challenge of slums: Global report on human settlements 2003. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 15(3), 337338.

Weinstein, A., & Partridge, M. (2015). How Can Struggling Communities Make a Comeback? Swank Program Policy Briefs.(Jun., 2011). Http://Aede. Osu. Edu/Sites/Drupal-Aede. Web/Files/Comeback% 20Cities% 20June.

Wu, F. (2000). The global and local dimensions of place-making: Remaking Shanghai as a world city. Urban Studies, 37(8), 13591377.

Christophers, B. (2011). Revisiting the Urbanization of Capital. Annal of the Association of American Geographers.

De Angelis, M. (2004). Separating the Doing and the Deed: Capital and the Continuous Character of Enclosures. Historical Materialism, 57-58.

Zambon, I., Serra, P., Grigoriadis, E., Carlucci, M., & Salvati, L. (2017). Emerging urban centrality: An entropy-based indicator of polycentric development and economic growth. Land Use Policy, 68, 365-371.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.