Corporate Sustainability Practices Impact on Firm Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Sector of Pakistan

Authors

  • Musa Khan

Abstract

This study examines Corporate Sustainability Practices (CSP) impact on Firm
Financial Performance (FFP) of the Top public listed commercial banks of
Pakistan. This study observes the annual reports of the top 10 Pakistani public
listed commercial banks by focusing on their market capitalization. Content
analysis technique which is used for data collection from their respective annual
reports for five years from 2012 to 2016 (both inclusive). Fixed Effect (FE) and
Random Effect (RE) model is utilized. Results indicates that CSP have positive
and significant impact on FFP. No significant impact of firm size and age was
found on FFP while leverage has significantly negative impact on FFP (ROA).
These findings suggest that in order to boost financial performance of
commercial banks in Pakistan CSP can be considered. These outcomes propose
that Pakistani commercial banks should be involved constantly in their CSP; as
the result shows that financial performance in commercial banks of Pakistan can
be improved with higher sustainable practices. Although there is scarcity of CSP
impact on FFP related studies; still the existing studies on CSP in Pakistan relate
to the study of such motivations of managers toward CSP and its reporting. A
wide-ranging empirical research on the CSP impact on FFP in top public listed
commercial banks of Pakistan is compartmented by this study.

References

Adams, C. A., Hill, W. Y., & Roberts, C. B. (1998). Corporate social reporting practices in western

europe: Legitimating corporate behaviour? British Accounting Review.

https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.1997.0060

Adams, C., & Narayanan, V. (2010). The “standardization” of sustainability reporting. In Sustainability

Accounting and Accountability (pp. 70–85). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203815281

Al-Matari, E. M., Al-Swidi, A. K., Fadzil, F. H., & Al-Matari, Y. A. (2012). The Impact of board

characteristics on Firm Performance: Evidence from Nonfinancial Listed Companies in Kuwaiti

Stock Exchange. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting.

https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v2i2.2384

Alsaeed, K. (2006). The association between firm-specific characteristics and disclosure: The case of

Saudi Arabia. Managerial Auditing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900610667256

Andrei Shleifer, & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance Andrei. PhD Proposal,

(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Athanasoglou, P. P., Delis, M. D., & Staikouras, C. K. (2006). Determinants of bank profitability in the

south eastern european region. Journal of Financial Decision Making.

https://doi.org/10.5897/JAERD12.088

Barako, D. G., & Brown, A. M. (2008). Corporate social reporting and board representation: Evidence

from the Kenyan banking sector. Journal of Management and Governance, 12(4), 309–324.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-008-9053-x

Barako, D. G., Hancock, P., & Izan, H. Y. (2006). Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by

Kenyan companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00491.x

Bhatia, A., & Chander, S. (2014). Management and Labour Studies Companies in India.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X14535161

Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2007). Drivers of corporate voluntary disclosure: A framework and empirical

evidence from Italy and the United States. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(2),

–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570710741028

Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2008). Social responsibility disclosure: A study of proxies for the

public visibility of Portuguese banks. British Accounting Review.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2008.02.004

Buhr, N. (1998). Environmental performance, legislation and annual report disclosure: the case of acid

rain and Falconbridge. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579810215455

Campbell, D. J. (2000). Legitimacy Theory or Managerial Reality Construction? Corporate Social

Disclosure in Marks and Spencer Plc Corporate Reports, 1969-1997. Accounting Forum.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6303.00030

Carroll - 1979 - A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance.pdf. (n.d.).

Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between

environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting,

Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003

Deckop, J. R., Merriman, K. K., & Gupta, S. (2006). Journal of Management.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305280113

Deegan, C., & Gordon, B. (1996). A Study of the Environmental Disclosure Practices of Australian

Corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), 187–199.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1996.9729510

Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1996). Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively ?

An analysis of environmental Protection Authority, 9(2), 50–67.

Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and environmental

disclosures of BHP from 1983-1997: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing &

Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435861

Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Voght, P. (2000). Firms’ Disclosure Reactions to Major Social Incidents:

Australian Evidence. Accounting Forum, 24(1), 101–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-

00031

Donaldson, T., Preston, L. E., & Preston, L. E. E. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation:

Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

Fischer, T. M., & Sawczyn, A. A. (2013). The relationship between corporate social performance and

corporate financial performance and the role of innovation : evidence from German listed firms,

–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-013-0171-5

Freeman. (n.d.). Freeman - 1984 - Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation.

Gardiner, L., Rubbens, C., & Bonfiglioli, E. (2003). Research: Big business, big responsibilities.

Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society.

https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700310483451

Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2011). GRI and ISO 26000 : How to use the GRI Guidelines in

conjunction with ISO 26000. Design, 16. Retrieved from

http://www.esglobal.com/GRI/files/ISOGRIReport.pdf

Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial

performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and Society, 36(1), 5–

https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600102

Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (1989). Corporate Social Reporting: A Rebuttal of Legitimacy Theory.

Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1989.9728863

Hassan, M. K., & Bashir, A.-H. M. (2005). Determinants of Islamic Banking Profitability. In Islamic

Perspectives on Wealth Creation. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748621002.003.0008

Herbohn, K., Walker, J., & Loo, H. Y. M. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility: The Link Between

Sustainability Disclosure and Sustainability Performance. Abacus, 50(4), 422–459.

https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12036

Herremans, I. M., Akathaporn, P., & McInnes, M. (1993). An investigation of corporate social

responsibility reputation and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)90044-7

Hossain, M., Tan, L. M., & Adams, M. (1994). Voluntary Disclosure in an Emerging Capital Market:

Some Empirical Evidence from Companies Listed on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange.

International Journal of Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

Ismail, K., & Chandler, R. (2005). Disclosure in the quarterly reports of Malaysian companies. Financial

Reporting, Regulation & ….

Janamrung, B., & Issarawornrawanich, P. (2015). The association between corporate social

responsibility index and performance of firms in industrial products and resources industries:

Empirical evidence from Thailand. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(4), 893–903.

https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2013-0141

Lee, J. (2012). Revisiting corporate reputation and firm performance link. Benchmarking: An

International Journal, 19(4), 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635771211258061

Leung, S., & Horwitz, B. (2004). Director ownership and voluntary segment disclosure: Hong Kong

evidence. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.012

Lindblom, C. K. (1994). The Implications of Organizational Legitimacy for Corporate Social

Performance and Disclosure. In Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference.

Mathews, M. R. (1997). Twenty-five years of social and environmental accounting research: Is there a

silver jubilee to celebrate? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004417

Milne, M. J., & Patten, D. M. (2002). Securing organizational legitimacy: An experimental decision case

examining the impact of environmental disclosures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability

Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435889

Moerman, L., & Van Der Laan, S. (2005). Social reporting in the tobacco industry: All smoke and

mirrors? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal.

https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570510600747

Murthy, V., & Abeysekera, I. (2008). Corporate social reporting practices of top Indian software firms.

Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 2(1), 36–59.

Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures

in Annual Reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-

(97)00008-1

Newson, M., & Deegan, C. (2002). Global expectations and their association with corporate social

disclosure practices in Australia, Singapore, and South Korea. International Journal of Accounting.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7063(02)00151-6

Niresh, J. A., & Velnampy, T. (2014). Firm Size and Profitability: A Study of Listed Manufacturing

Firms ed Manufacturing Firms in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Business and Management.

https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v9n4p57

O’Donovan, G. (2002). Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and

predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435870

O’Dwyer, B. (2002). Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure: An Irish story. Accounting,

Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435898

Oliver, C. (1991). STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES. Academy of

Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1991.4279002

Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A

Meta-Analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–411.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910

Owusu-Ansah, S. (1998). The impact of corporate attribites on the extent of mandatory disclosure and

reporting by listed companies in Zimbabwe. The International Journal of Accounting.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7063(98)90015-2

Patten, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A

note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-

(92)90042-Q

Philippon, T., & Philippon, T. (2007). No Title, (September).

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (n.d.). of Corporate Philanthropy.

Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of

stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-

(92)90015-K

Sharif, M., & Rashid, K. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR)

reporting: An empirical evidence from commercial banks (CB) of Pakistan. Quality and Quantity,

(5), 2501–2521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9903-8

Shen, C. H., & Chang, Y. (2009). Ambition versus conscience, does corporate social responsibility pay

off? the application of matching methods. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(SUPPL. 1), 133–153.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9826-9

Slater, H. R. D. D. J., & Romi, A. M. (2013). Beyond ‘“ Does it Pay to be Green ?”’ A Meta-Analysis

of Moderators of the CEP – CFP Relationship, 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1268-

Tilt, C. A. (1994). The Influence of External Pressure Groups on Corporate SocialnDisclosure: Some

Empirical Evidence. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal (Vol. 7).

https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579410069849

Tsang, E. W. K. (1998). A longitudinal study of corporate social reporting in Singapore: The case of the

banking, food and beverages and hotel industries. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579810239873

VAN DER PLOEG, L., & VANCLAY, F. (2013). Credible Claim or Corporate Spin?: a Checklist To

Evaluate Corporate Sustainability Reports. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and

Management, 15(03), 1350012. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333213500129

Waddock, Sandra A; Graves, S. B., & Samuel, B. (1997). the Corporate Social Performance - Financial

Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G

Wang, H., & Choi, J. (2013). A New Look at the Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship:

The Moderating Roles of Temporal and Interdomain Consistency in Corporate Social Performance.

Journal of Management, 39(2), 416–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310375850

Downloads

Published

30.09.2019

How to Cite

Khan, M. (2019). Corporate Sustainability Practices Impact on Firm Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Sector of Pakistan. CITY UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 9(2). Retrieved from http://cusitjournals.com/index.php/CURJ/article/view/205

Issue

Section

Articles